Solutions
Two products. One decision layer.
Mercury tells you what needs attention now. Hydra tells you how much life is left. Both read the telemetry you already downlink.
Ask for a demoOne decision layer
Running beside your mission control system.
Mercury and Hydra read the telemetry you already downlink, in your environment, with no re-architecture of the ground segment.
Which product answers which question
| Mercury | Hydra | |
|---|---|---|
| Question answered | What needs attention now, and what should be done about it | How much life is left, and when it runs out |
| Time horizon | This pass, this shift | Weeks to years |
| Input | Telemetry from your MCS, your written procedures, advanced deterministic logic and AI detection | Housekeeping telemetry you already downlink |
| Output | A qualified event with a recommended action | Per-component reliability and remaining useful life |
| Decision it supports | Respond, escalate, or stand down | Extend or retire, and how to defend the choice |
Mercury
The conops you wrote, running.
Live mission assurance in daily operations: what to watch, what matters, what to do, applied on every pass. Telemetry and signals become qualified events with a recommended action, so a lean team can run a growing fleet.
Hydra
Live mission assurance across the whole mission.
Monitoring tells you the battery is fine today. Hydra tells you how much of it is left. It reads the stress each component has absorbed in flight, recomputes reliability continuously, and forecasts when it will cross the line.
Our approach
We model the individual satellite, not the class.
Assurance is not detection. Detection asks whether something changed. Assurance asks whether the fleet is still being operated as intended, and what to do when it is not.
Both products run alongside your existing mission control system. Run them together, or start with one.